Why is Role Based Access Control Important?

-

Role Based Access Control is a is a way of assigning different permissions to different users and checking whether a user has permission to perform an action in the code during execution. An access control system finds application wherever there is a need to regulate, limit, or prohibit the presence and transit of personnel in offices and production plants.

An access Control system is ultimately a powerful and flexible tool that allows the planning and control of access control. Access control assumes a crucial role in the context of security when it is necessary, for example:

  • Transits and attendance for Safety and Quality purposes.
  • Prevent unauthorized access to critical production areas in which pathogens or dangerous agents are treated;
  • Define obligatory paths for production staff in compliance with the process procedures; monitoring and interacting with the production manager.
  • Prevent the use of machinery by unauthorized persons;
  • Limit the number of employees present in a process area.
The role-based control allows the management of information in real-time by providing a very valid tool.

What Systems Are Used Today?

RBAC (Role Based Access Control) is the technology most used today to create access control systems. RBAC brought an innovative wave in the way of transmitting and receiving "wireless" information.

Who Manages These Systems?

By its nature, the access control system is part of the security management of a work environment.

If the system is exclusively intended for the detection of attendance for the calculation of payslips, we speak of the "Attendance detection system", as a rule, separate from the "Role Based Access Control", in which case the management may fall within the scope of the 'Human resources office.

If the aim is to guarantee the safety of the production process, the management will be the responsibility of the production manager or the safety manager.

Often, improperly, the management of the access control system is entrusted to the IT Manager but, in general, regardless of the contexts, it is advisable to have the Security Manager as the only contact person.

The access control system can make a significant contribution to improving the organization of the process and it is important that its purposes and management methods are clearly defined. Obviously it is necessary that the system has a Manager who knows him very well, who takes care of the management and updates and that there is a synergistic relationship between the Manager, manufacturer, and installer of the system. In fact, an installed and unmanaged system will never give the expected results and, if there is a problem, nobody will be able to help.

Furthermore, Could The Possibility of Uniquely Identifying Each Operator at Access in Classified Areas be a Valid Tool for Managing Operator Validations?


By its nature, the management software of a Role Based Access Control system is suitable for managing personnel authorizations. Through Foxpass, it is in fact possible to extend the control to the validity of the professional qualifications and certifications necessary to operate, and therefore access, in a specific department and at a certain time. Near the expiration of the validity of a certificate, the system can send a notification to both the operator and the Manager.

Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Secure Your Data From Hacker With RBAC System

-
The role based access control system is a secure security approach that helps to protect your business sensitive data from cyber hackers. It is an authorized and restricted cyber security system that gives access data to users that is based on their roles within an organization. It is based on the concept of roles and privileges. The data using the access system is dependent upon authority, competency, and responsibilities.
Read more

Security of Zero Trust Model in Business Infrastructure

-
The Zero Trust Mode l is a cybersecurity approach that assumes no trust by default, both inside and outside a corporate network. This means that every user, device, and application trying to access resources on a private network must be verified and authenticated, regardless of their location or network environment. The model challenges the traditional notion of "trust but verify" by implementing strict access controls and continuous verification processes. 
Read more

Zero Trust vs. Traditional Security: The Power of Automation and AI in Modern Cybersecurity

-
Image
The Zero Trust Model has emerged as a powerful alternative to traditional security models in the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape. It challenges the long-standing notion of Trust within a network and offers a more proactive, comprehensive approach to safeguarding sensitive data.  This article conducts a comparative analysis of Zero Trust and traditional security models, shedding light on what sets Zero Trust apart and why it is gaining momentum. Traditional Security: The Perimeter Defense Paradigm The idea of a network perimeter has long been a cornerstone of conventional security approaches. Trust is often assumed inside the network, while external entities are treated as potential threats. Critical characteristics of traditional security include: Firewalls and Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) - They serve as a perimeter defense and stop unlawful entry. To identify insider risks, though, they might have trouble. VPN and Network Segmentation -   These technologies crea...
Read more