What's the point of Role Based Access Control?

-


Can a stolen password give you the keys to an entire kingdom? In fact, it appears that 81% of data thefts that took place in 2019 used stolen or weak passwords to access the network.

We need to do better than that in 2020. We need to review the standards for our rights and implement Role Based Access Control (RBAC) and configure SSH keys to ensure that users stay where they belong. assigned on the network. To configure authentication using SSH keys, you must visit Foxpass as they offer easy Role Based Access Control that restrict SSH access. 

Role Based Access Control (RBAC): what is it?


Roles Based Access Control (RBAC) is a network security concept whereby the network grants rights to users based on their role in the enterprise. It's easy as pie: the financial department has no right to put its nose into the data of the human resources department, and vice versa.

Each user of the network has a role, and each role has a set of access rights to the resources of the organization. For example, employees in the finance department have access to the CRM system according to the use they have of it, to electronic messaging, and to the network share dedicated to the financial department. It could stop there.

Implemented correctly, an RBAC with SSH key will be transparent to users. Roles are assigned in the background and each user has access to the applications and data they need to work. SSH keys are a pair of cryptographic keys that can be used to authenticate to an SSH server; it is an alternative method to the use of passwords. 

Why set up an RBAC?

Implementing Role Based Access Control Optimizes Operational Efficiency, Protects Data from Leak or Theft Risk, Reduces IT Administration and Support Work, and Helps Meet Needs audit.

Users must be able to access the data they need to do their jobs - granting them access to data that is not useful to them compromises security and increases the risk of data leakage, theft, alteration, or hacking. Hackers like nothing more than accessing a single account and moving sideways across the network to find data they could sell. If you have implemented an effective RBAC, hackers collide with a wall as soon as they try to get out of the bubble of the role of the user they hacked. 

Obviously, the situation is serious when it turns out that an account has been hacked. But it could be so much worse if this user had access to all sensitive data. Even if the user concerned works in human resources and has access to personally identifiable information (PII), the hacker will not have the possibility of moving easily to access the data of the financial and management teams.

RBAC also reduces the IT and administrative workload of the organization and improves user productivity. Even if it doesn't seem logical at first, it makes sense if you take the trouble to think about it. IT doesn't have to manage custom rights for each user, and affected users have easier access to the right data. 

Malicious people will use several tactics to break through your security. An effective data security monitoring and analysis platform will enforce the rules defined in your RBAC, send alerts to your security team, and provide information that will deter hacking attempts while cutting data theft. Foxpass offers easy role based access control that restricts SSH access by users or groups to subsets of your hosts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Secure Your Data From Hacker With RBAC System

-
The role based access control system is a secure security approach that helps to protect your business sensitive data from cyber hackers. It is an authorized and restricted cyber security system that gives access data to users that is based on their roles within an organization. It is based on the concept of roles and privileges. The data using the access system is dependent upon authority, competency, and responsibilities.
Read more

Security of Zero Trust Model in Business Infrastructure

-
The Zero Trust Mode l is a cybersecurity approach that assumes no trust by default, both inside and outside a corporate network. This means that every user, device, and application trying to access resources on a private network must be verified and authenticated, regardless of their location or network environment. The model challenges the traditional notion of "trust but verify" by implementing strict access controls and continuous verification processes. 
Read more

Zero Trust vs. Traditional Security: The Power of Automation and AI in Modern Cybersecurity

-
Image
The Zero Trust Model has emerged as a powerful alternative to traditional security models in the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape. It challenges the long-standing notion of Trust within a network and offers a more proactive, comprehensive approach to safeguarding sensitive data.  This article conducts a comparative analysis of Zero Trust and traditional security models, shedding light on what sets Zero Trust apart and why it is gaining momentum. Traditional Security: The Perimeter Defense Paradigm The idea of a network perimeter has long been a cornerstone of conventional security approaches. Trust is often assumed inside the network, while external entities are treated as potential threats. Critical characteristics of traditional security include: Firewalls and Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) - They serve as a perimeter defense and stop unlawful entry. To identify insider risks, though, they might have trouble. VPN and Network Segmentation -   These technologies crea...
Read more